REPORT: the EVIDENCE
VISIT: the ESSENTIAL
NEW, from AustLawPublish ,
Journals for the Australian Universities.
if your University is there.
Evidence that no-one can trust The University of
This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.
PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
pig parasite Porter playing with himself
in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of
and tell us what you think about this University.
taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of
Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of
Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The
University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns
College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of
The University of Queensland. For years prior and years since
then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned
by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally
challenged emotional shell of the trustee.
Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of
Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated
against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being
accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.
Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by
corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St
Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property
[my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all
orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt
cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt
this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was
being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter
inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the
theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.
We will build into this caption
here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite . Whereever
this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the
image of Douglas Porter with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations
of the photo of Douglas Porter with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .
to HAIG REPORT home frames]
How can anyone deal with a University where the assurances of, and
WITH, THAT UNIVERSITY are worth
nothing and the
Vice-Chancellor and Registrar and Secretary are happy that that is
public knowledge? International
Students should consider
if they want to deal with a University when that University cannot be
trusted at all.
[now ex]-Registrar of The University of Queensland,
Checkout his HOME
This is documentary evidence [below];
writing, by the Registrar
and Secretary of The University of Queensland [UQ], Mr Douglas
Porter, that his word counts
for nothing. If the word
and assurance of the top
employee of the UQ counts for nothing, then no-one can trust the word
of any employee of UQ. If an employee is challenged, all that
employee has to do is to quote this admission by Douglas Porter.
In fact, this is the CULTURE OF THE
QUEENSLAND: International Students should be
wary of dealing with UQ. My experience, as DOCUMENTED HERE,
suggests that if you take the word of
Douglas Porter or anyone else at UQ, you can still be cheated by
UQ. It matters not
even if you obtain the CONTRACT in writing as Porter was quite
prepared to give me confirmation of his promise in writing as
below. [This was, and
STILL IS, a contract, as I gave consideration for this promise from UQ.]
This makes the actions of UQ
ILLEGAL, as a BREACH OF
CONTRACT. This was not a contract involving land so
the Statute of Frauds does not apply and the contract does not have to
be in writing. It cannot be voided by UQ, as they have tried to
do. As you will see from Porter's letter to me, HE HAS
IMPLICATED THE VICE-CHANCELLOR JOHN HAY in this DISHONEST,
UNTRUSTWORTHY and ILLEGAL REPUDIATION OF CONTRACT.
What is more, UQ, Porter and THE
VICE-CHANCELLOR of UQ, owed
DOUBLY, A FIDUCIARY DUTY.
Hay has been central in the decision to not only BULLY A DISABLED
STUDENT, but also breach, the PROMISE, the CONTRACTUAL DUTY and
FIDUCIARY DUTY OWED TO THAT STUDENT. The FIDUCIARY DUTY
only because the student was and is disabled, but also, because UQ, by
the actions of its Registrar, Douglas Porter, agreed to obtain a report
for itself and also as trustee for the student. In that
fiduciary duty arose regardless of the student being disabled.
Additionally, the student had supplied CONSIDERATION for the promise to
make the report available for consideration of both UQ and the disabled
It says volumes that the
Registrar and Secretary, AND THE
VICE-CHANCELLOR of UQ,
were so blasť
and indifferent about honesty and trust that Porter was prepared to
give me in WRITING, the PROOF that he and the VICE-CHANCELLOR were
prepared to publish that the word of the Registrar and hence the
University is worth naught.
This failure on the
part of UQ did not occur in just a trifling
matter. This was, and still is, a matter of serious
discrimination against the disabled by UQ and the Registrar Douglas
Porter. I will
explain the matter in detail below. Click
here to see the full letter as a .pdf file.
Unfortunately, I am disabled.
I have two assistance dogs and I am entitled by the law to take them
with me where ever I go, subject only to restrictions
as provided for in the Disability
Discrimination Act 1992
I was a student at UQ and was
consistently discriminated against and
harassed by UQ, Porter and other staff at UQ. Porter had
written to me. This indicated that he was receiving legal advice
from Internal staff. As one trained in law and with a special
interest in the DDA, I was aware that this internal advice was in
error. I had substantial rights, and UQ was denying me
them. Porter was receiving the incorrect advice and
harassing me as a result. He stated that he did not wish
to be continually confronting me and desired that I not continually
assert my rights. He required that I practice a "less
confrontational regime". I suggested that if he wished me
to act differently, it may be a good idea to obtain an external legal
opinion to be the basis of our further discussions, as the present
advice he was receiving was in great error. I was
particular to ascertain that I would receive a copy of the external
legal advice as I would need to see that advice to further our
discussions. Porter agreed. In accord with Porter's
request, I agreed to not press matters until that opinion was
received. Before the advice was received, UQ decided to
impound my dogs, right in front of me.
When the advice was received, and,
"following discussion with the
Vice-Chancellor" [that is John Hay, AC]
Porter decided to RENEG ON HIS
AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT and not
release it to me,
contrary to what he had AGREED AND CONTRACTED with me to do, on behalf
of UQ. Clearly, just as I expected, the advice proved that
I was correct as per the pages on
this site. UQ and
Porter then waived Legal Professional
Privilege [lpp] in a number
of ways, on a number of occasions,
by stating that he, Porter knew what the law was in this regard
because, "as you know, I have received an external legal advice on the
matter", and on another occasion when Porter set out to me what he
required and that that was in line with the external legal advice from
that particular firm of lawyers.
to HAIG REPORT home frames]