HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


 Precise Nature Qld Residential Tenancy Agreement & Why Brisbane City Council Wants Them:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

DirectoryWebsite/header.php

 David Askern aka Minge Askern:
commits Criminal Fraud & other crimes for
 Brisbane City Council.  

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Precise Nature Qld Residential Tenancy & Why Brisbane City Council Wants Them

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Brisbane City Council Criminal Fraud

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Precise Nature Qld Residential Tenancy & Why Brisbane City Council Wants Them

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

 Content: Precise Nature Qld Residential Tenancy & Why Brisbane City Council Wants Them

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Brisbane City Council Criminal Fraud

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

Precise Nature Qld Residential Tenancy & Why Brisbane City Council Wants Them:

PreciseNatureQldResidentialTenancyAgreement.php The Residential Tenancy Agreement [rta] in Queensland is an animal of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 [RTRAA]. [For relevance, we will discuss here, only the situation of premises of a single residence being a house on a single block of land.]  The necessary, essential qualities of an rta are included in the RTRAA. Without an exhaustive listing, caravans and houseboats are also included. 

Clearly, the BCC want the lease for these premises [and all "premises" where they are lessor/landlord but not where they are lessee], to be a residential tenancy agreement [rta].  We will explain elsewhere, in detail, the most likely reasons that that would be the case, [basically because they are dumb dishonest fraudsters and it is easier for them to defraud tenants on a Residential Tenancy].

We will explain here firstly, the reason that the lease for this Rochedale South property was not, from the beginning or ever, an rta, secondly, the reason that the purportedly "renegotiated" lease was not an rta, [nor even valid], and thirdly, what would have been necessary if an rta was to come into existence.

http://HaigReport.com/images/20130714Sections10_11_12ResidentialTenanciesRoomingAccommodationAct2008_ResidTenRAA08Cr01.jpgSection 10 RTRAA [to the left], is a major point.   It states that the premises must be used exclusively as a place of residence or mainly a a place of residence.  This means the premises, must be used to the extent of more than 50% [exclusively or mainly], as a  residence, [or place of residence].  "The premises" in this situation means more than just the building.  "The premises" means the subject of the leasing  agreement; usually land and buildings/improvements.

As far as I know there is no definition as to how the proportions are calculated.  A definition would be necessary in only grey areas.

There could be a number of ways of determining this proportion to be more than 50%.   If there were a residential building and a commercial office and/or industrial shed, the proportions could be determined on the basis of floor area, or value of the improvement, or respective rental values, or respective proportions of land value.  Further cogitation would be necessary if any but not all of these proportions was less than 50%. In this case of the Rochedale South five acre property/premises, all variously calculated proportions are much greater than 50%. The visitor can see on that Google Satellite image of the Rochedale South property that Mario DiCarlo included in his fax to the BCC, the many buildings that are on  the premises the subject of the Lease.  The detail can and will be provided, if necessary in the future, by way of affidavit and witness evidence to any court [or tribunal; the BCC persist with attempting to have QCAT, which has no jurisdiction in this matter, to make a ruling - we have trumped BCC in  QCAT Appeals once already, but BCC are too dumb, or expect Qld Mafia to be so corrupt, so as to favour them yet again].

In Section 12, to the left [or above,depending on your browser settings], note the words, "...gives to someone else a right to occupy residential premises as a residence." It could be argued that the "someone else" must be a natural person, to need or even have a "residence" the subject of the RTRAA.  The object of the RTRAA is to legislate for, and regulate habitation for humans, natural persons; places of residence for natural persons.   Hence, it could be argued that if the lessee for a residential premises is a corporation, that is not a natural person, then the lease cannot be a Residential Tenancy Agreement subject to the RTRAA.

http://HaigReport.com/images/20130714Section38HeadleasesForEmployeeHousingResidentialTenanciesRoomingAccommodationAct2008_ResidTenRAA08Cr01.jpgThe visitor will notice that the BCC's "Minge" Ketchion identifies the lessee/tenant as Face 2 Face Foundation Pty Ltd.  All  of the relevant individuals at BCC and Mario knew that Face 2 Face Foundation Pty Ltd was the lessee and Mario, as he lived next door, and had all his dealing for Face 2 Face Foundation Pty Ltd with its director Chris Newton, knew Chris Newton, the director with whom he dealt for the corporation, and his family, lived in the house on the five acres leased by Face 2 Face Foundation Pty Ltd


Consider Section 38  "Headleases for employee housing" below/left.  Clearly as above, all knew Section 38 applied to this situation. Therefore they all knew that this lease was not a Residential Tenancy Agreement and that the RTRAA did not apply.  They all knew it was inappropriate to use an RTA Form18a, a General Tenancy Agreement for the lease of 953 Rochedale Road, Rochedale South.   However, that does not make it what it isn't.  It is still not a Residential Tenancy Agreement, despite all the efforts of Mario and BCC Minges to so characterise it.  Ignorance of the law  is no excuse.  So, anyone who purports to act as though the actual lease in place for 953 Rochedale Road, is a Residential Tenancy Agreement to which the RTRAA would apply, [for example, by applying to QCAT for a termination (Beware Pauline Davis)] is an accessory after the fact to any of the crimes so far perpetrated, including major criminal fraud.  [Do a Google search for Pauline Davis; of where she is now and where she has been.]

Qld Civil and Administrative Tribunal [QCAT] has original jurisdiction  for  RTRAA.   If the RTRAA does not  apply to a lease/tenancy, by virtue of the RTRAA, then QCAT does not have any jurisdiction in this matter.

 Hence, QCAT did not, and still does not, have jurisdiction.  QCAT has jurisdiction only if such is specified in legislation.  The QCAT legislation, IS Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009. It is relevant therefore to  see that the purported agreements begin to be written as having Chris Newton as the tenant.  If the advice to do that was part of the expunged detail from that letter by Minge Ketchion, that would be conclusive of fraud.  If it is not in that expunged detail, it is irrelevant as there is so much other evidence of fraud by BCC, BCC personnel and Mario.

It matters not that they have not been able to complete their fraud, [although they are still trying].  Even if they fail to ever complete their fraud, which is our intention, they ALL have still committed a serious crime of "attempted  fraud".  Anything anyone now does to attempt to conceal the crime, given that ignorance of the law is no excuse, and even if they had been involved in the preparation or commission of the crime, is guilty also of being an "Accessory after the fact".

The visitor will notice that Mario has included the director Chris Newton as the prime tenant [Item 2].


Menu: Brisbane City Council Criminal Fraud: