HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.



 Case I'm taking to the District Court: ADMISSION EVIDENCE that cops Henri Rantala, Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon and more Senior Cops are corrupt.:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header.php

   Rantala-Gate:  aka
Qld Police Corruption:

Are,  Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, CORRUPT?  Consider the EVIDENCE!

Fraud & Corruption EXPOSED

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Case I'm taking to the District Court: ADMISSION EVIDENCE that cops Henri Rantala, Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon and more Senior Cops are corrupt.

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Case I'm taking to the District Court: ADMISSION EVIDENCE that cops Henri Rantala, Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon and more Senior Cops are corrupt.

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

 Content: Case I'm taking to the District Court: ADMISSION EVIDENCE that cops Henri Rantala, Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon and more Senior Cops are corrupt.

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

Case I'm taking to the District Court: ADMISSION EVIDENCE that cops Henri Rantala, Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon and more Senior Cops are corrupt.:

includedLawAndRantalaEvidencePoliceBCC_Crimes.php My appeal has now, as from the 17th January, 2014, been given the title:

BD 115/14 MATHEWS -V- COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

I am required to file an "Outline of Argument" by 12th February, 2014.   In  fact, I will place all the detail I require in my Outline, on this HaigReport page, and then it will be a simple matter for me to Highlight the Contents "portion" of this page as published on HaigReport, copy and paste that into a document file which will be titled as my "Outline of Argument".  [There is in existence a PDF copy of this transcript.  Where I quote text from the transcript, in this "Outline", I will state page and line numbers from that PDF file copy of the transcript for that quote.  That reference will be to the beginning of the quoted text on that pdf copy of the transcript. As an Online Visitor to HaigReport, you will not need the pdf file as there will be hyperlinks to the same material on my Online version of the Transcript.- as well as the actual quote on a purple background on this page.   Apparently, the Judges of the District Court are still "paper bound" and so will have the transcript on paper, which will be the pdf layout on paper.]

So that the URL for the start of the Contents portion of this page here, will appear in the Outline of Argument, I advise that the URL is
http://haigreport.com/QldPoliceCorruption/AdmissionEvidenceCopsHenriRantalaSuperintendentDalePointonCorruptCaseForDistrictCourt.php#ContentAdmissionEvidenceCopsHenriRantalaSuperintendentDalePointonCorruptCaseForDistrictCourt  /.

This page is devoted to detailing the law and evidence, being, in the case of wrongs by the cop Henri Elias Rantala, admissions by him, as he was giving the evidence under oath, that will be the substance of the Sec 222 Justices Act 1886 Appeal that I am taking to the District Court.  It is a matter of the evidence that was before Paul M. Kluck, the magistrate.  The evidence of the police is that those police and senior police committed numerous criminal offences.  I shall also refer to the evidence of the other cop who was at the scene and who gave evidence under oath, Monica Louise Antony.

I am appealing the refusal of mr Paul M. Kluck, the magistrate who refused my application on the 10th January, 2014, to refer the individuals I named including Henri Elias Rantala himself, Rantala's superior Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, Officers, employees and contractors, of the Brisbane City Council, Rantala's cop partner Monica Louise Antony,  and other  Senior police, to  the CMC and/or the DPP  for prosecution for their crimes.

It is an  anathema to our system of justice and law for a magistrate, when all the evidence is before him, to deliberately turn a  blind eye to crimes by  police, with whom he is in  regular contact in courts, and when all, magistrate and police, are paid by the same government.  It would similarly be an anathema to our system of justice and law, for a District Court judge or Justices of the Queensland Court of Appeal to similarly turn a blind eye and accept that police can commit crimes at will, and produce evidence of same before a magistrate.  Justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done. 

If any judges rely upon some excuse to not consider the evidence of admission by police of crimes committed by police and other public sector, I will view that as a deliberate act to not consider the clear conclusive evidence of crimes by police and the public sector, of which they are a part, suggesting those judges are corrupt.  As judges and magistrates have "judicial immunity", they would have no fear of acting corruptly in their role as judge or magistrate respectively.

Let us consider the law.

Sec 222 Justices Act [with my emphasis], reads;

222 Appeal to a single judge

(1) If a person feels aggrieved as complainant, defendant or
otherwise by an order made by justices or a justice in a
summary way on a complaint for an offence or breach of duty,
the person may appeal within 1 month after the date of the
order to a District Court judge.

(2) However, the following exceptions apply—
(a) a person may not appeal under this section against a
conviction or order made in a summary way under the
Criminal Code, section 651;
(b) if the order the subject of the proposed appeal is an
order of justices dealing summarily with an indictable
offence, a complainant aggrieved by the decision may
appeal under this section only against sentence or an
order for costs;
(c) if a defendant pleads guilty or admits the truth of a
complaint, a person may only appeal under this section
on the sole ground that a fine, penalty, forfeiture or
punishment was excessive or inadequate.

None  of those exceptions apply in this case.

Consider the definition of Order in the Justices Act 1886:

order includes any order, adjudication, grant or refusal of any
application
, and any determination of whatsoever kind made
by a Magistrates Court, and any refusal by a Magistrates
Court to hear and determine
any complaint or to entertain any
application made to it
, but does not include any order made by
justices committing a defendant for trial for an indictable
offence, or dismissing a charge of an indictable offence or
granting or refusing to grant bail and, in the last mentioned
case, whether or not the justices are sitting as a Magistrates
Court or to hear an examination of witnesses in relation to an
indictable offence.

That is a wide definition and includes the magistrate's refusal to grant my application "from the bar table".

  Each magistrate either swears an Oath or  makes a Confirmation as to his duty as a magistrate.

His Oath has him ==>
"according to law..."

Magistrates Act 1991

Below is the latest version of the Oath and of the Affirmation.

Magistrates Regulation 2013

Sec 2 Form of oath or affirmation for magistrates—Act, s 9

(1)For section 9(1) of the Act, the oath is as follows—
‘I, ..(name).., do sincerely promise and swear that
I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second as lawful Sovereign of Australia and to Her heirs and successors, according to law; and
In the office of magistrate, I will at all times and in all things do equal justice to all persons and discharge the duties and responsibilities of the office according to law to the best of my knowledge and ability without fear favour or affection.

So help me God!’.


(2)For section 9(1) of the Act, the affirmation is as follows—

‘I, ..(name).., do sincerely promise and affirm that
I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second as lawful Sovereign of Australia and to Her heirs and successors, according to law; and
In the office of magistrate, I will at all times and in all things do equal justice to all persons and discharge the duties and responsibilities of the office according to law to the best of my knowledge and ability without fear favour or affection.’.


The previous oath and previous affirmation under the previous regulation under the Magistrates Act 1991 was under the Magistrates Regulation 2003, and appear below.

Sec 3 Form of oath or affirmation for magistrates—Act, s 9(1)

(1) For the purpose of section 9(1) of the Act, the oath is as
follows—
‘I, , swear that I will properly serve Her Majesty
Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her Heirs and Successors, in the
office of magistrate and that I will treat everyone fairly and
without bias according to law—SO HELP ME GOD!’.

(2) For the purpose of section 9(1) of the Act, the affirmation is as
follows—
‘I, , solemnly affirm that I will properly serve Her
Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her Heirs and
Successors, in the office of magistrate and that I will treat
everyone fairly and without bias according to law.’.

That regulation, Section 2 Commencement, states:
This regulation commences on 1 September 2003.

The Supreme Court Library website states for mr Kluck the magistrate:

Mr Paul M Kluck

Magistrate, Magistrates Court
Judicial Career

    Magistrate, Magistrates Court (2003–)

Thus Mr Kluck may not have sworn or affirmed that wording.   Notwithstanding that, M Kluck does have a duty, to act according to law.

In terms of the letter Oath/affirmation wording, turning a blind eye by magistrates to police and public sector crime, is not treating "everyone fairly", as such is treating police much better than fairly and treating those whose rights have been infringed, less fairly.   Turning a blind eye to police public sector crime, would definitely show a bias in favour of the public sector.

The Police, and officers of the Brisbane City Council, all  involved in any way, formed a Common Purpose.

The Qld Criminal  Code defines  'Common Purpose"  thus:

8 Offences committed in prosecution of common purpose

When 2 or more persons form a common intention to
prosecute an unlawful purpose in conjunction with one
another, and in the prosecution of such purpose an offence is
committed of such a nature that its commission was a
probable consequence of the prosecution of such purpose,
each of them is deemed to have committed the offence.

That is a wide definition.  Accordingly, all those who entered with the  police and wanted the police to force entry, are all guilty of Armed Robbery even though they were not armed.  This will include the Brisbane City Council parasite who called the police, and his two 'mates'.  You can see him on his mobile phone calling the police.

Armed Robbers from Brisbane City Council: Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, & Paul Maxwell at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia on 29th November, 2004.
[Click photo to see the Simple Proposition of why these are ARMED ROBBERS]
http://HaigReport.com/Photos/20041129ArmedRobbersSteveBeckOwenBenvenutiPaulMaxwell254HawkenDriveStLucia.jpg


CRIMINALS [ALL guilty of ARMED ROBBERY] are Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell:
These are three of the Brisbane City Council [BCC] CriminalsFor the sake of Yahoo, Google and Google Images, LEFT to RIGHT these parasitic CRIMINALS are Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell: We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this group of three gutless bullies (does one look like a poof - anyway, all three are criminals).  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell, CRIMINALS [ALL guilty of ARMED ROBBERY], all public sector parasites from part of the Australian Government sector [Brisbane City Council].   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell, CRIMINALS [ALL guilty of ARMED ROBBERY], all public sector parasites from part of the Australian Government sector [Brisbane City Council]. 



Of course, an Armed Robbery did occur.  Concealing the Armed Robbery, was the reason that the magistrate mr Topsy Turvey aka   Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,   was so eager to "get rid of it" - the "it" being the police prosecution of me as a result of the arrest of myself by Rantala at the time of his doing the armed robbery.  I had the evidence and witnesses to prove that the arrest was unlawful because the police and everyone else did not have authority to enter, or even be there at that time for that reason; to remove my possessions from my premises.

Magistrate Topsy Turvey  arrived in court that day half an hour late.  He came into the court convinced that he wanted to "get rid of it".  Had he not acted unlawfully, as was determined by the Court of Appeal on 20th July, 2010 in CA case with

CITATION:

R v Mathews [2010] QCA 196,


the evidence that the Brisbane City Council and theQld  police had committed an armed robbery would have become public.  Now it has.   There have been innumerable  instances  of 'cover-up' of this crime by government and  public sector to "keep a lid" on the armed robbery as it was a step in the process of stealing my house and land owned by me as the beneficiary of a trust, for Douglas Porter, the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland, and St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, which was run by St Johns College Council of which the Chair is this fraudster, and  public masterbater, Douglas Porter. 

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 


Given the number of improper even corrupt decision I have received from courts in Queensland, an adverse decision, by a judge of the District Court, for whatever excuse, will be viewed by me as corrupt.

Of all the rights possessed by a person in Australia, one has to be protection of the individual by the state [ie government of all levels].  In my case I am being repeatedly attacked by the state and its representatives.

Now, the evidence before mr Paul M Kluck, the magistrate in this case, acting pursuant to the Justices Act 1886, is that police have committed numerous criminal offences against me.  He has chosen to turn a "blind eye" to the crimes, while ridiculing me for my disability, and abusing me by forcing me to attempt to do what my disability prevented my doing, to the extent of making me ill.

When I  took the appeal of the Topsy Turvey decision under a Sec 222 appeal to the District Court, DCJ Leanne Clare thought wrongly that she could "put a lid"or "Keep a lid" on the evidence becoming anymore public, but the Court of Appeal decided otherwise.

However, no more evidence than the transcript coram Kluck is necessary to show all admissions that Armed Robbery by Rantala and all other there present, did occur.

Elements needed to prove Armed Robbery:


One or more of the Common Purpose party was armed although it is not necessary that they show or pull their firearm, [or handcuffs too as possession of handcuffs constitute being 'armed'];

I quote here again from the Qld Criminal Code:

Chapter 38 Stealing with violence—extortion by threats

409 Definition of robbery

Any person who steals anything, and, at or immediately
before or immediately after the time of stealing it, uses or
threatens to use actual violence to any person or property
in
order to obtain the thing stolen or to prevent or overcome
resistance to its being stolen, is said to be guilty of robbery.

411 Punishment of robbery

(1) Any person who commits the crime of robbery is liable to
imprisonment for 14 years.
(2) If the offender is or pretends to be armed with any dangerous
or offensive weapon or instrument
, or is in company with 1 or
more other person or persons, or if, at or immediately before
or immediately after the time of the robbery, the offender
wounds or uses any other personal violence to any person, the
offender is liable to imprisonment for life[Both conditions apply to the armed robbery of myself.]

412 Attempted robbery

(1) Any person who assaults any person with intent to steal
anything, and, at or immediately before or immediately after
the time of the assault, uses or threatens to use actual violence
to any person or property in order to obtain the thing intended
to be stolen, or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being
stolen, is guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for 7
years.
(2) If the offender is or pretends to be armed with any dangerous
or offensive weapon or instrument
, or is in company with 1 or
more other person or persons,
the offender is liable to
imprisonment for 14 years.  [Both conditions apply to the armed robbery of myself.]
(3) If the offender is armed with any dangerous or offensive
weapon, instrument or noxious substance, and at or
immediately before or immediately after the time of the
assault the offender wounds, or uses other personal violence
to, any person by the weapon, instrument or noxious
substance, the offender is liable to imprisonment for life.
  [Handcuffs are an "offensive weapon". Rantala 'arrested' me and handcuffed, when  he was in he process of the Armed Robbery.]

413 Assault with intent to steal

Any person who assaults any person with intent to steal
anything is guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for
3 years.    [I was arrested and handcuffed, without any justification whatsoever, &, while they all were engaged in criminal conduct.. That constitutes assault and violence to me.]

414 Demanding property with menaces with intent to steal

Any person who, with intent to steal anything, demands it
from any person with threats of any injury or detriment of any
kind to be caused to the other person, either by the offender or
by any other person, if the demand is not complied with, is
guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.

415 Extortion

(1) A person (the demander) who, without reasonable cause,
makes a demand—
(a) with intent to—
(i) gain a benefit for any person (whether or not the
demander); or
(ii) cause a detriment to any person other than the
demander; and
(b) with a threat to cause a detriment to any person other
than the demander;
commits a crime.
Maximum penalty—
(a) if carrying out the threat causes, or would be likely to
cause, serious personal injury to a person other than the
offender—life imprisonment; or
(b) if carrying out the threat causes, or would be likely to
cause, substantial economic loss in an industrial or
commercial activity conducted by a person or entity
other than the offender (whether the activity is
conducted by a public authority or as a private
enterprise)—life imprisonment; or
(c) otherwise—14 years imprisonment.

(2) It is immaterial that—
(a) the demand or threat is made in a way ordinarily used to
inform the public rather than a particular person; or
(b) the threat does not specify the detriment to be caused; or
(c) the threat does not specify the person to whom the
detriment is to be caused or specifies this in a general
way; or
Example—
a threat to cause a detriment to the public or any members of the
public
(d) the detriment is to be caused by someone other than the
demander.
(3) A reference to making a demand includes causing someone to
receive a demand.
(4) A reference to a threat to cause a detriment to any person
other than the demander includes a statement that gives rise to
a threat of detriment to the other person.
(5) A prosecution for an offence in which it is intended to rely on
a circumstance of aggravation mentioned in paragraph (a) or
(b) of the penalty can not be commenced without the consent
of the Attorney-General.
(6) In this section—
threat includes a statement that may reasonably be interpreted
as a threat.


Now for the evidence being admissions by Rantala.


   Police Constable Henri Elias Rantala aka 'Minge'  aka 'Dummy'  
20041129 more reduced and
            cropped photo police Rantala.jpg About this parasite , Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, now groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.
Rantala is a rare case within the Queensland Police Service [QPS] in that he he was "groomed" and "fast tracked" to continue the fraud, corruption and bribery that is the QPS within the wholesale corruption that is the Queensland labor Government.  [One major way to reduce this is the restoration of the Upper House  to the Queensland Parliament, the Legislative Council, as a democratically elected house.  It was abolished by the Queensland labor government in 1922.]  Rantala was groomed to be a police prosecutor, which is one position where police can be particularly corrupt.  As Prosecutors, they had Advocates Immunity.  I have been able to have this parasite under oath in the witness box subject to my cross examination.   In his evidence in chief at "Call Henri Elias Rantala" he produced a litany of lies.   My cross examination of him, and his replies thereto, at My Cross-Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala,  are most instructive.  Considering all the subsequent events in the attempted corrupt cover-up of this gross crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland Government, the extended period of planning activity that went into the perpetration of this Armed Robbery, and the fact that Rantala Left Indooroopilly Station from which he launched this Armed Robbery, targeting me, soon after in January2005, it appears Rantala was in integral part of this armed Robbery targeting me.  Just a few days prior, Douglas Porter, the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, for whom, as its Rep, Porter was orchestrating this Armed Robbery as a step towards stealing my beneficial ownership of my home, house and land, caused an attack on me and then called the police to me, and Rantala appeared..

 I will build in this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form.  This caption will accompany the image of Henri Elias Rantala where ever it appears on our websites.  It will be progressively added to all previous representations of his photo.
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government. 


 Firstly,
Rantala Admits & Sets Firmly Date of Armed Robbery 20041129_29th November, 2004
[page 3-141 line17]

Thirteen? Okay, and in November 2004, where were you stationed?   I was stationed at Indooroopilly Police Station.

In particular on the 29th of November 2004, can you tell the Court please what occurred on that day?   Certainly.

When you were rostered on, for a start?   

Yes. I was rostered a 6 a.m. to 2 p.m. shift in the company of Constable Monica Antony and I was working from Indooroopilly Police Station in a general duties shift. In that capacity we were tasked by the Police Communications Centre to attend at 254 Hawken Drive at St Lucia, to attend the defendant's residence.


That then sets firmly the legislation and law that was in operation on that day; in particular, sec 160, of the Health Act 1937.
[I do not have to prove that.  It is a matter of law.  As ignorance of the law is no excuse, everyone, including the judges are deemed to  know the law, perfectly.]   Sec 160 was the law at that time.  It is not now.  It was omitted from the statute circa April, 2005.
 
==>

CodePara/HealthAct1937Section160Entry.php

 Health Act 1937: Section160 Entry
(1) The chief executive, the chief health officer, the local government and an officer of the department or local government may enter from time to time into and upon any house or premises for the purpose of examining as to the existence of any nuisance thereon or whether any of the provisions of this Act are being contravened, or of executing any work or making any inspection authorized to be executed or made under the provisions of this Act or any order, or local law, or making any inquiry under the provisions of this Act, or generally for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Act or any order, or local law, at any time between the hours of 9a.m. and 6p.m. of any day, or in the case of a business then at any hour when such business is in progress or is usually carried on.

(2) If such admission to any house or premises is refused, any justice, on complaint thereof by any such officer (made after reasonable notice in writing of the intention to make it has been given to the occupier), may, by order under the justice’s hand [ie a 'COURT ORDER'], require the occupier to admit such officer into the house or premises; and if no occupier can be found the justice may, on proof of that fact, by order under the justice’s hand authorise any such officer to enter such house or premises.





Rantala [and Antony] were armed.  ==>  Corrupt Cop Henri Elias Rantala Admits He Was Armed With Glock Gun /.
[page 3-158 line17]

Okay. Good. So, were you armed at the time?   Performing general duties, I always am with a Glock and numerous other accoutrements  [WOW - he has 'accoutrements'.]. That's a standard     

Including handcuffs?   Yeah, standard equipment.

Okay. So, that's armament - you're armed?   Yes.

The Brisbane City Council called the police as shown in the  photograph I took of the three Brisbane City Council Armed Robber Criminals:

Armed Robbers from Brisbane City Council: Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, & Paul Maxwell at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia on 29th November, 2004.
[Click photo to see the Simple Proposition of why these are ARMED ROBBERS]
http://HaigReport.com/Photos/20041129ArmedRobbersSteveBeckOwenBenvenutiPaulMaxwell254HawkenDriveStLucia.jpg


CRIMINALS [ALL guilty of ARMED ROBBERY] are Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell:
These are three of the Brisbane City Council [BCC] CriminalsFor the sake of Yahoo, Google and Google Images, LEFT to RIGHT these parasitic CRIMINALS are Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell: We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this group of three gutless bullies (does one look like a poof - anyway, all three are criminals).  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell, CRIMINALS [ALL guilty of ARMED ROBBERY], all public sector parasites from part of the Australian Government sector [Brisbane City Council].   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell, CRIMINALS [ALL guilty of ARMED ROBBERY], all public sector parasites from part of the Australian Government sector [Brisbane City Council]. 


Rantala referred to that particular photo.  Henri Rantala Said Owen Benvenuti In Middle Of Three was in Charge At Scene.
[page 3-142 line40]


Okay, can I just stop you there? Do you recognise the gentlemen - the three gentlemen in that photograph?   I can't recall the names of the two gentlemen on the outside, however the gentleman in the middle is Owen Benvenuti, and as I understand, he was the council officer in charge at the scene. There were those three gentlemen there, as well as a number of workmen that were in attendance, as part of the cleanup.




Rantala Admitted that He Was There To Force Entry For Brisbane City Council

Rantala had made statements in writing.  However, statements are not 'evidence', they are 'pleadings' as a rule, and would not amount to an admission.  I needed to have Rantala make these admissions so the evidence could be used against him.   Hence, I had to have him confirm under oath, what he had stated in his police statement;and he did . 

This whole matter is a case of my "leading with the chin", so I could turn their attack on me back on the corrupt police.   It is pointless trying to prosecute corrupt government officials in Queensland, as the corrupt courts will defeat anyone in an extensive series of possible practices.

[page 3-159 line09]

Mmm. And that the gate was - I put it to you the gate was closed, and that the Council were not inside the yard at the time?   No, they weren't inside the yard at the time.

They weren't?   No.

Okay. And they wanted to - they had - they wanted to go inside the yard. Is that true?   That’s true.

Okay. And that you said words to the effect - did you say in here - you said words to the effect that, "Russell, these officers are going to get inside your yard to clean it up to get - if you get in the way, you may be arrested." You said in your statement?   That’s right.

That’s right. And you say you said words to that effect?   Yes.

So, you - I would suggest that I - they had not gone inside the yard at that time?   

No.And that they were wanting you to ensure that they could get in; that I was not permitting them to go in?   It was indicated to me that they wanted me to - there to keep the peace and to stop any possibility of violence occurring.


Rantala identified the letter, dated 25th November, 2004, that the BCC sent  to me.  I quote from the transcript.
[page 3-155 line26]




Okay. So, what authority did they have?   It was stipulated to me the authority lay in the provisions of the Health Act. The - now, I can't be quoted on this, it's a vague recollection that there may have been some sort of notice that they've indicated they had sent to you regarding the matter. But as far as the specifics of it, I honestly, five - nearly six years ago, it's hard to remember.


Could we see the web site, please?
BENCH: Which one?
DEFENDANT: Are you familiar with these web sites?
BENCH: Which web site?
DEFENDANT: Haig Report. Is there a Haig Report BCC Council or something? Letter from Council? I can't see anything on my screen. Now, is that - would that be - is that the notice you saw?   Yes, it appears so. It - yeah.
I'll put it     ?   They had indicated some documentation however, I haven't committed the specifics of that documentation to memory, but that looks very similar to the documentation that I saw on the day.
Like that?   Yes.
 

 
This following is that actual letter.   It is the only letter from the Council on the CD from the website exhibit fitting these descriptions.

http://haigreport.com/20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg




Rantala falsely states that the Statute, the Health Act 1937, Gives The BCC_Authority To Enter. This is an error of Law, and is no justification for forcing entry.  I quote [this transcript follows directly from the transcript immediately above.]:  

[page 3-156 line01]




I put it to you that does not give them authority to enter my property. I put it to you - I put it to you, does that give them authority to enter my property? Can you - if someone has a letter such as that, will you as a police officer, enforce entry?   The Act gives them authority to enter, not the letter. [ - FALSE statement of law.]



I have a little more to add pinpointing in Rantala's evidence where he indicates that possessions of mine, including topsoil, were removed, so completing the robbery element.

The Robbery element is often and regularly evidenced in the transcripts.  We need show only one.  In fact the Brisbane City Council were there for three days clearing my yard of my possessions to ease the way for me to be removed from the premises by the corrupt law in Queensland, by the corrupt Qld police force, so my house and land that I owned as the sole beneficiary of a TRUST, could be stolen from me for the use of Douglas Porter's The University of Queensland.  One reference is when Rantala Speaks in his evidence in  chief Of Council Workers Removing Material From My Yard, thus:

[page 3-144 line10]

Okay. And what transpired after you told him that?   Well, one particular incident that I noticed is council - a number of the council workers were attempting to remove rubbish from his yard. I can't describe exactly what it was, they were removing; it was something disgusting they were removing from the yard, and they were - attempting to put it in a wheelie bin - not a wheelie bin, a skip.


Mmm-hmm?   And the defendant went over and grabbed some of the items off the workers, that were attempting to remove the items. And I noticed that they were becoming particularly annoyed at his behaviour     




I will also pinpoint where Rantala dumps his supervisor Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon into the criminal quagmire as an accessory after the fact.

Of course, if you are too eager to wait for me to complete this page, you can read all of what Rantala stated under oath at Call Henri Elias Rantala/.

We can refer to the evidence of Monica Louise Antony as that was evidence coram Kluck.


   Police Constable Monica Louise Antony aka 'Big A for Antony' 

DCP_0517 Big Big Big A
            Constable Antony.jpg
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this twit brainwashed with a bidet .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly. 



As for the 'robbery' element, Antony's evidence indicates how the Common Purpose party members were removing possessions of mine.

There are many mentions of my possessions being removed from my yard after they had gained unlawful entry.  One such is You Were Yelling And Screaming At The Council To Stop Taking Things Out Of Your Yard And Not To Throw That Away /
[page 3-109 line38]


DEFENDANT: Yes, okay. Well, now - okay, so you say the council were already in my yard, when you arrived?

MR HUNTER: She's already answered that.

WITNESS: I'm not sure.

DEFENDANT: You're not sure? Okay, you're not sure. So - and you said, I was yelling and screaming?   You were, you were yelling and screaming at the council to stop taking things out of your yard, and not to throw that away.

As for Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon: 

http://HaigReport.com/jpgFileImages/20091021RantalaAdmissionSeniorPoliceCoruptionRot01_cr01.jpg
The above image is an excerpt from the statement  by Henri Elias Rantala dated 21st October, 2009.
'20091021RantalaAdmissionSeniorPoliceCoruptionRot01_cr01.jpgMinge' Rantala specifically identified his supervisor Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon as an "accessory after the fact".  Corrupt Cop Henri Rantala Implicates Superintendent Dale Pointon/.  Rantala also fingered Senior Officers From Ethical Standards Command.  Rantala also fingered  Senior Officers From Security Intelligence Branch.   Rantala also fingered Senior Officers From State Crime Operations Command.
  1. Rantala Implicates Senior Officers From Ethical Standards Command
  2. Rantala Implicates Senior Officers From Security Intelligence Branch
  3. Rantala Implicates Senior Officers From State Crime Operations Command
[page 3-152 line47]


Okay. Now, in your - I'll just change topics for a moment, if I - I'll come back to that. You say in your statement that - you say - 31.
MR HUNTER: Might the witness see the statement, your Honour?


http://HaigReport.com/jpgFileImages/20091021RantalaAdmissionSeniorPoliceCoruptionRot01_cr01.jpg
[The above image is the Paragraph 31 excerpt from the statement  by Henri Elias Rantala dated 21st October, 2009.]

BENCH: Yes. Just have a look at your statement.

DEFENDANT: Can I sit down please, your Honour? My back is killing me.

BENCH: Yes.

DEFENDANT: I'm not used to this, your Honour. Standing. I'll be okay for a little while?   That's 31, yes, I've had     


[This now is paragraph 31.  You can see what this dummy has done. He has implicated Superintendent Dale Pointon and other senior police, as accessories after the fact.]  [I am publishing his full statement and will link to it once published.]
http://HaigReport.com/jpgFileImages/20091021RantalaAdmissionSeniorPoliceCoruptionRot01_cr01.jpg

Okay. Could I remain seated, please, your Honour?
BENCH: Yes.



DEFENDANT: And you said, "I'd been contacted by Superintendent Pointon". Would that be Dale Pointon?   That - that's correct.

Okay?   The - the only part of that paragraph that's incorrect is, it should read 2007 not 2006.


Okay. But you did say 2006 at the time, did you?   Well, I - that's a typographical error because it should be 2007 and not 2006.

Okay?   And similarly, in the same vein is, under paragraph 29 where it says, "8 January 2006", that's "8 January 2007".Okay. So, you've been alerted to that, have you?   Well, I've had a read of a report that I prepared at the time regarding that matter and the - the content of that report - the report was dated in 2007 and I noticed in the content of the report that the date was 2006 and that was - that as incorrect.


I see?   So, I have a - still have a copy of that report that I prepared at the time.


Okay. So, that's - so, when you prepared this your recollection wasn't too good?   No. It was based on some of the content contained in that report and then I - in hindsight I had a look at the - the date on that report and then realised that there was a date error on the content of that     


Okay?        in terms of your - date.


Okay. Now, in this evidence, in your statement, you've said that you were contacted by Dale Pointon, officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations Command?   Yes.


Is that true?   Yes.
What are their names?
MR HUNTER: Well, how is this relevant?


BENCH: Relevance, Mr Mathews?


DEFENDANT: Well, I mean, it's easy enough to say it's happened but I mean, if the people aren't, you know, they aren't actual     
What's the context of the     
DEFENDANT: The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day. I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, officers from the Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations Command relative - relatives all asking questions about material from 2006 - which is now seven - until the present day.


BENCH: So, what do you want to know?


DEFENDANT: I want to know the names of the people from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations.


BENCH: Do you know who they are?   I have committed them to memory because what has happened is that they made phone calls to me, indicated where they were from and now I'm - I remember more where they're from as opposed to who specifically they are. And they had - I had conversations with them about this particular topic and they wanted to know a bit of a background. As a result, subsequent to that, I had sent an email to my District Officer, that's Superintendent Pointon, about this particular topic. The defendant has a copy of the email attached to his web site so, that particular point is not unknown to him, but I don't know, because I made no records anywhere, of the particular names of these individuals that have contacted me.








Menu: Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command: