HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.



 Proof To Police Minister Dempsey Police Armed Robbery Superintendent Dale Pointon Henri Rantala Monica Antony Three Others:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header.php

   Rantala-Gate:  aka
Qld Police Corruption:

Are,  Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, CORRUPT?  Consider the EVIDENCE!

Fraud & Corruption EXPOSED

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Proof To Police Minister Dempsey of Police Armed Robbery by Superintendent Dale Pointon, Henri Rantala, Monica Antony Three Others

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Proof To Police Minister Dempsey of Police Armed Robbery by Superintendent Dale Pointon, Henri Rantala, Monica Antony Three Others

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

 Content: Proof To Police Minister Dempsey of Police Armed Robbery by Superintendent Dale Pointon, Henri Rantala, Monica Antony Three Others

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

 Menu: Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command

Menu: HaigReport's Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command:



  1. Qld police commissioner Ian Stewart is CORRUPT:

  2. Radicalised Muslim Youth Attacks Corrupt Police 1 Charles St Parramatta:

  3. Scabbard is an appropriate description for each member of the police:

  4. Taking It Up To The Corrupt Qld Police Service In 2015:

  5. Actual Email Sent To Police Commissioner and Minister: Qld Police are CORRUPT: Will they Confront us?:

  6. Overwhelming Evidence Qld Police, State of Qld & Commonwealth DPP Target Disabled Persons:

  7. Henri Rantala pathetic dumb parasite cop, devoid of integrity Statement 21st October, 2009 signed but not witnessed:

  8. Case I'm taking to the District Court: ADMISSION EVIDENCE that cops Henri Rantala, Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon and more Senior Cops are corrupt.:

  9. I Have Turned Corrupt Qld Police Attack On Me Back On Corrupt Police:

  10. OPEN EMAIL 31st October, 2012; Police Minister Dempsey Where is Ephemeral or Fictitious Arrest Warrant?:

  11. My Reply To Peter Rogers Parliamentary Crime Misconduct Committee Re Specify Complaint CMC:

  12. OPEN EMAIL Parliamentary CMC Attempted Murder, Armed Robbery Complicity of BOTH Qld police & CMC:

  13. Qld police lies to Will Cocks AHRC re police blocking My Email Stealing My Disability Aids, Computer & Camera:

  14. OPEN EMAIL Police Minister Dempsey Attempted Murder Injuries Prove Police Corruption Hospital Records DESTROYED:

  15. Proof To Police Minister Dempsey of Police Armed Robbery by Superintendent Dale Pointon, Henri Rantala, Monica Antony Three Others:

  16. More Threats Qld Police Pathetic Response Police Crimes EA MacDonald Murder Complicit Armed Robbery:

  17. OPEN LETTER 20120821 to ex-cop LNP Police Minister Jack Dempsey: Re Purported Arrest Warrant, Armed Robbery, & Attempted Murder:

  18. Attempted Murder of Russell Mathews By Qld Police on 14thJanuary,1996 At 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia Q.4065:

  19. Horrific Intended Fatal Injuries Inflicted on Russell Mathews By Qld Police on14th January, 1996 At 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia Q.4065:

  20. Index: Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command:

  21.  Rantala-Gate:  aka Queensland Police Corruption: Stat Dec: Dr Christine Eastwood; Magistrate John Costanzo; Robert Needham; Helen Couper; CMC_Peter Lindsay Hansard 25 Nov 2009:

  22. Open Letter:  Rantala-Gate:  aka Corrupt Qld Police; Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, Security Intelligence Branch, Ethical Standards, State Crime Operations Command [does this include now retired, [since July 2008], Assistant Commissioner Peter Swindells?]:

  23. Corrupt Queensland Police;  Rantala-Gate:  Written Admission of Blocking My Email ; then Lie About Reason:

  24. Australian Government,  aka Rantala-Gate: , Tortures Political Dissident:
included20121026OpenEmailDempsey.php
Hon Jack Dempsey MP

Member for Bundaberg
Minister for Police and Community Safety
Level 24, State Law Building
50 Ann Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
GPO Box 15195, City East QLD 4002
tel: 323 90199
fax: 3221 9987
police@ministerial.qld.gov.au

G'day Minister,

This involves a extremely serious matter for a police commissioner.  Not only did police officer Henri Elias Rantala commit an armed robbery, but he has, UNDER  OATH, implicated Superintendent Dale Pointon and senior officers from four specialists divisions of the Queensland police as ACCESSORIES TO ARMED ROBBERY.  That means that there are at least SIX police officers, with the most senior being Superintendent Dale Pointon GUILTY of this ARMED ROBBERY.

Henri Elias Rantala wrote in a statement, viz:

"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day. I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking question about the material from 2006 until the present day."

"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day.  I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking questions about the material from 2006 until the present day."



However, police officer Henri Elias Rantala has confirmed that under oath on 28th June,2010: VIZ:


DEFENDANT: And you said, "I'd been contacted by Superintendent Pointon". Would that be Dale Pointon?   That - that's correct.


...///...

Okay?        in terms of your - date.


Okay. Now, in this evidence, in your statement, you've said that you were contacted by Dale Pointon, officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations Command?   Yes.


Is that true?   Yes.


What are their names?


MR HUNTER: Well, how is this relevant?


BENCH: Relevance, Mr Mathews?


DEFENDANT: Well, I mean, it's easy enough to say it's happened but I mean, if the people aren't, you know, they aren't actual     


What's the context of the     


DEFENDANT: The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day. I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, officers from the Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations Command relative - relatives all asking questions about material from 2006 - which is now seven - until the present day.


BENCH: So, what do you want to know?


DEFENDANT: I want to know the names of the people from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations.


BENCH: Do you know who they are?   I have committed them to memory because what has happened is that they made phone calls to me, indicated where they were from and now I'm - I remember more where they're from as opposed to who specifically they are. And they had - I had conversations with them about this particular topic and they wanted to know a bit of a background. As a result, subsequent to that, I had sent an email to my District Officer, that's Superintendent Pointon, about this particular topic. The defendant has a copy of the email attached to his web site so, that particular point is not unknown to him, but I don't know, because I made no records anywhere, of the particular names of these individuals that have contacted me.


DEFENDANT: Well, I beg our pardon, that - now, you say an email or something or other on a web site?   Yes.


What is that email? Can we - is it - is it on the records before the Court?   I don't know. I've found it on the internet attached to one of your web pages and it's my communication with myself and the Superintendent Pointon.


A web page attributed to me you say?   Yes.


And what does this - and what does it - what does it - what's the substance of this?   It's - it's pretty much - it's a pdf copy of the email I sent to my superintendent. He wanted - he wanted an indication of what the background was. I indicated that - and if I had any particular issues with it. And I indicated specifically the number of sections that had contacted me about this particular issue and that it was of substantial annoyance to me. That is the email that I communicated to - with my superintendent regarding this matter. You, for some reason, or someone has obtained a copy of this email document, made a pdf document out of it and attached it to the web site because it can be freely accessed from the internet.




This is an OPEN EMAIL/LETTER that is now online here.

I shall send you a copy today, but I will continue to tweak the OPEN EMAIL by adding more hyperlinks.    

The purpose of this OPEN EMAIL/LETTER is to ensure that you and your office pass all this information to the Qld police and follow up on what they are doing.  The evidence is indisputable.  It is conclusive. I was targeted for an Armed Robbery.  No doubt the Qld police felt so confident because they had been able to completely conceal the attempted Murder of me on 14th January, 1996 where the police had been complicit, the Qld police decided they would commit this Armed Robbery of me, to further weaken me because I had survived the Attempted Murder of myself despite the horrific life threatening injuries inflicted by a person who must have been a trained killer to inflict the injuries I suffered.   I will pursue the Attempted Murder later but I am now pursuing the police for the Armed Robbery of me on 29th November, 2004.  As Armed Robbery of disabled citizens by Qld  police is a matter of concern  to  all Queenslanders, as well as all Australians, and because Australia is now on the World stage having gained a position on the UN Security Council and because Australia's Governor-General Quentin Bryce who is swanning about on the World Stage, is linked to the Attempted Murder with Qld police complicity, of myself, I am sure you will ensure the police do pursue this to its proper conclusion.

I had an overwhelming victory in the Qld Court of Appeal on 20th July, 2010 in regard to this Armed Robbery, because the cop who lead the Armed Robbery was so foolish as to arrest me.  The charges that the police pursued were dismissed absolutely.   The magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich was too friendly and accommodating to the Qld police in a facade that was termed by the Court of Appeal, Topsy Turvy a la Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland;  "Sentence first - verdict afterwards".

I Quote from that decision; [implicating further complicity in unlawful conduct by police Sergeant COX]:

7]At some point, the magistrate must have become concerned about the irregularity as the bench charge sheet is endorsed by the magistrate in these terms:

"1.12.2008 Pursuant to section 188(1)(a) and 5(a) I propose to re-open this sentence and set aside the conviction and relist this matter for trial. Pursuant to 188(3)(a) the parties must be given the opportunity to be heard. I therefore list the application for hearing before me in court 32 at 2.30 pm on Wednesday 17 December 2008. The court is required to notify the parties."

[8]About three and a half year later, on 17 December 2008, the matter was brought on again for hearing before the same magistrate. Mr Mathews' name was called more than twice without a response and court officers checked outside the court but could not find him. The record does not show that Mr Mathews was given notice of this hearing. The following exchange occurred in his absence:

"BENCH: … Well I'm going to re-open - you – you don't want to be heard on this, do you?

[POLICE PROSECUTOR]: No, just offer no evidence, your Honour.

BENCH: I re-open this matter and set aside the conviction and sentence. Then you said you're offering no evidence; is that right?

[POLICE PROSECUTOR]: That's - that's correct, your Honour.

BENCH: Prosecutor offers no evidence, charge is dismissed, [Mr Mathews] is discharged. Notify [Mr Mathews]. All right. Thank you."

[9]The only sensible inference from the notation on the bench charge sheet and from the transcript is that the magistrate purported to make this order under s 188 Penalties and Sentences Act. There is nothing to suggest the order was purported to be made under s 147A Justices Act or under the court's inherent power to correct errors such as a void order. It is, therefore, unnecessary to determine whether s 147A, or any inherent power, could have been invoked to set aside the order of 1 June 2005.

[10]There is no evidence of when Mr Mathews was informed of the order of 17 December 2008. About 15 months later, on 2 March 2010, Mr Mathews applied for an extension of time to appeal from his conviction and sentence on 1 June 2005 to the District Court under s 222 Justices Act stating his grounds as:

"1. I was denied Natural Justice in that I was denied the Right to be Heard. By applying Sec 19 Penalty and Sentences Act, [the magistrate] was finding me guilty, without a plea and without a hearing or his hearing evidence. I had not pleaded guilty. I had paid for and subpoenaed five witnesses together with documents. [The magistrate] bellowed at me to prevent my speaking when I calmly requested explanation.

2. This was done in this way, by [the magistrate], to PERVERT the course of Justice, and to conceal the Armed Robbery of me by the Police per … and the Brisbane City Council on 29th November, 2004, 30th November, 2004, to and including 1st December, 2004.

3. This Armed Robbery of me was ARMED ROBBERY of a citizen of Australia, by A BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA, when it was not alleged that I had done anything wrong. This was Armed Robbery of a Citizen by the Australian Government for NO REASON. [The] Magistrate … as another branch of the Australian Government, has greatly exacerbated this criminal wrong of Armed Robbery against a citizen by the Australian Government, by acting in an ultra vires manner to conceal this criminal wrong against me by the Australian Government. Thus, the actions of [the magistrate] are criminal also."

[11]His application was heard in the District Court on 19 March 2010. The District Court judge considered that because Mr Mathews' finding of guilt was set aside and the nuisance charge dismissed on 17 December 2008, there was no order in the Magistrates Court from which Mr Mathews could appeal and so refused the application for an extension of time. Her Honour noted:

"While Mr Mathews is concerned about the validity of the process by which he was exonerated, this ruling should serve as a formal confirmation and a public record of the fact that, at this point in time, Mr Mathews does not have a conviction for public nuisance.

Mr Mathews is not guilty of the public nuisance offence with which he was charged in 2004."

[12]Mr Mathews then applied for leave to appeal to this Court under s 118(3) District Court of Queensland Act from the District Court judge's order. The grounds of his application are:

"The conviction and operation of the Penalty and Sentences Act on 1 June, 2005, was void ab initio as I was denied a hearing.

On 1 December, 2008, the same magistrate … reopened the sentence and purported to revoke the conviction. This was ultra vires, beyond power of Penalty & Sentences Act Sec 188, which he purported to use."

[13]Mr Mathews has given no explanation for the very significant delay in seeking to appeal. There is, however, no evidence of when he became aware of the order of 17 December 2008. It is clear that the order made by the magistrate on 1 June 2005 must now be set aside if the order of 17 December 2008, which purported to do that, was made without jurisdiction. The gross irregularity and injustice perpetrated on 1 June 2005 in the magistrate's sentencing Mr Mathews before determining, according to law, whether he was guilty of the offence, cannot be permitted to stand. The endorsement on the bench charge sheet of 1 December 2008 suggests that the magistrate recognised this, although many years later. But instead of the parties correcting the matter lawfully, for example, on appeal, the magistrate purported to correct his egregious error by way of s 188 Penalties and Sentences Act which relevantly provides:

"Court may reopen sentencing proceedings

188(1) If a court has in, or in connection with, a criminal proceeding … —

(a) imposed a sentence that is not in accordance with the law; or

(c) imposed a sentence decided on a clear factual error of substance;

the court, whether or not differently constituted, may reopen the proceeding.

(3) If a court reopens a proceeding, it—

(a) must give the parties an opportunity to be heard; and

(b) may resentence the offender—

(i) for a reopening under subsection (1)(a)—to a sentence in accordance with law; or

(iii) for a reopening under subsection (1)(c)—to a sentence that takes into account the factual error;

(c) may amend any relevant conviction or order to the extent necessary to take into account the sentence imposed under paragraph (b).

(5) The court may reopen the proceeding—

(a) on its own initiative at any time; …"

[14]It is clear from the terms of s 188 that it allows a court to re-open and correct a sentence. And it is equally clear that s 188 is not intended and does not allow a court to re-open a proceeding and set aside a finding of guilt other than insofar as this may be related to correcting the sentence. Further, as there is no evidence that Mr Mathews was notified of the hearing of 17 December 2008, it is not shown that he was given the opportunity to be heard.

[15]Mr Mathews is therefore right in his contention that the magistrate's orders of 1 June 2005 and 17 December 2005 should both be set aside on appeal. Unfortunately, Mr Mathews did not appeal from those orders within time and has given no satisfactory explanation for his lengthy delay, although, as I have noted, it is unclear when he became aware of the order of 17 December 2008. But, despite his tardiness in appealing, the interests of justice require that time should be extended and the appeal to this Court allowed so that the manifest errors on the record of the Magistrates Court, which have now been drawn to this Court's attention, can be corrected. In proceeding as he did under the Penalties and Sentences Act on 17 December 2008, the magistrate was acting without jurisdiction so that the order made was unlawful and the District Court should have set it aside on appeal. The order of 1 June 2005 sentencing Mr Mathews before determining, according to law, whether he was guilty or not guilty, was also unlawful and the District Court should have set it aside on appeal.

The transcript of the clandestine hearing on 17th December, 2008, involving police Sergeant COX:



I now quote from that Court of Appeal decision quoting from the transcript of the hearing coram Walter Harvey Ehrich on 1st June, 2005,
The police prosecutor was a Sergeant T. G. IND as shown in scanned image below the quote:  

[4]According to the transcript, the hearing proceeded as follows:

"[POLICE PROSECUTOR]: ... the Council have issued a notice to [Mr Mathews] to clean up his yard. He hasn't complied with that.

The Council have gone there, and they've approached [Mr Mathews], and he hasn't complied, and they've actually got some trucks, and it's taken them a couple of days, I think, three days, in fact, to clean up the yard.

And during the first day, [Mr Mathews] has actually caused a public nuisance.

BENCH: What's he done?

[MR MATHEWS]: Alleged, your Honour, alleged.

BENCH: Just a minute. What's he done? What's he alleged to have done?

[POLICE PROSECUTOR]: His actions have been confrontational. He's actually got in the way of the workers, who've been there lawfully. There has - evidence-----

BENCH: And what, was he arrested, taken into custody?

[POLICE PROSECUTOR]: Yes.

BENCH: Yes. How long was he in custody?

[POLICE PROSECUTOR]: He was only in custody with bail conditions for a short time.

And the bail conditions were enough so that he could stay away from the premises until 6 p.m. that afternoon, so-----

BENCH: It's all been done, everything's finalised.

[POLICE PROSECUTOR]: Yes.

[MR MATHEWS]: Excuse me, your Honour. Could I make a mention at this stage that the witnesses are in this Court?

BENCH: Well, just sit down, would you?

[MR MATHEWS]: There are witnesses in the Court, sorry, your Honour.

BENCH: Sit down. Will an absolute discharge under section 19 of the Penalties and Sentences Act suffice in this matter? Get rid of it?

[POLICE PROSECUTOR]: Yes, your Honour, if that's acceptable.

[MR MATHEWS]: What is that, please, your Honour?

BENCH: Yes, I've heard the facts. I've heard the facts. I think the appropriate penalty in this case is an absolute discharge under section 19 of the Penalties and Sentences Act. You are discharged.

[MR MATHEWS]: Thank you, your Honour."



The Title Page for this brief Transcript is immediately above.



The Qld police have acted criminally towards me in the past.  I have already received a response from the police trying to distance themselves from this matter and threatening me into the bargain.

When I had reported to them this Armed Robbery on 29th November, 2004 of me by Qld police , they blocked my email by which I communicate as I am disabled and this to some extent alleviates the effects of my disabilities, as opposed to any other form of communication.

20100907QldPoliceResponseToAHRC_ReBlockingMyEmailParagraphs.php The Queensland police have advised [See #2 on Page 2]:
http://HaigReport.com/DocumentaryEvidence/20100907QldPoliceResponseToAHRC_ReBlockingMyEmailParagraphs.jpg


Transcription [for Googlebot and other search engines]:  "The QPS has in place a process for blocking an email sender to QPS email accounts when the email sender is considered to be utilising the QPS email system to harass, menace or cause offence pursuant to s474.17 Criminal Code Act 1995(Clth) or other relevant legislation.

"Mr Mathews' email account was blocked by QPS as at October 2006 following an assessment of the volume and nature of emails being sent by him to various QPS email accounts."


We doubt that the police will be able to substantiate that.  This will be interesting to pursue.  We believe that the Queensland Police have made false statements to a Commonwealth
agency, in the exercise of its function.  Accordingly, we believe the Federal Police should become involved.  We will ensure that happens.  This has a long way to go.  We do not expect to have all these wins immediately.  We expect to have occasional wins at an increasing frequency.  Those bastards tried to kill me.



Those emails they found offensive were in regard to my reporting this Armed Robbery. What it comes down to is that, as detailed below in this email, near the end of this emal, they required a Court Order, which they did not have.  

So now they claim [by the pretentious cop with the pretentious signature


http://HaigReport.com/images/20121008MoreCoverUpPoliceEAMacDonaldActingAssistanceCommissionerMetropolitanNorthRegionPretentiousSign.jpg],,

http://HaigReport.com/images/20121008ExcerptPoliceCoverUpArmedRobberyEAMacDonaldActingAssistanceCommissionerMetropolitanNorthRegion.jpg

Transcription [for Googlebot and other Search Engine  bots]:  "With respect to your allegation you were the victim of an Armed Robbery committed by police on 21 [sic] November, 2004, [Russell alleged the 29th November, 2004, as was the reality], I am advised that there is no official record of you making a complaint at the time.  I am further advised that there has been no complaints made to the Crime  and Misconduct Commission the matter as outlined in your email."



I have previously referred you Minister Dempsey, to the fact that Queensland Police [both of these following photos were taken on the day; of Rantala, shortly before he arrested me], in the persons of Henri Elias Rantala


   Police Constable Henri Elias Rantala aka 'Minge'  aka 'Dummy'  
20041129 more reduced and
            cropped photo police Rantala.jpg About this parasite , Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, now groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.
Rantala is a rare case within the Queensland Police Service [QPS] in that he he was "groomed" and "fast tracked" to continue the fraud, corruption and bribery that is the QPS within the wholesale corruption that is the Queensland labor Government.  [One major way to reduce this is the restoration of the Upper House  to the Queensland Parliament, the Legislative Council, as a democratically elected house.  It was abolished by the Queensland labor government in 1922.]  Rantala was groomed to be a police prosecutor, which is one position where police can be particularly corrupt.  As Prosecutors, they had Advocates Immunity.  I have been able to have this parasite under oath in the witness box subject to my cross examination.   In his evidence in chief at "Call Henri Elias Rantala" he produced a litany of lies.   My cross examination of him, and his replies thereto, at My Cross-Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala,  are most instructive.  Considering all the subsequent events in the attempted corrupt cover-up of this gross crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland Government, the extended period of planning activity that went into the perpetration of this Armed Robbery, and the fact that Rantala Left Indooroopilly Station from which he launched this Armed Robbery, targeting me, soon after in January2005, it appears Rantala was in integral part of this armed Robbery targeting me.  Just a few days prior, Douglas Porter, the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, for whom, as its Rep, Porter was orchestrating this Armed Robbery as a step towards stealing my beneficial ownership of my home, house and land, caused an attack on me and then called the police to me, and Rantala appeared..

 I will build in this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form.  This caption will accompany the image of Henri Elias Rantala where ever it appears on our websites.  It will be progressively added to all previous representations of his photo.
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government. 


and Monica Antony


   Police Constable Monica Louise Antony aka 'Big A for Antony' 

DCP_0517-Big_Big Big A
            Constable Antony.jpg
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this twit brainwashed with a bidet .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly. 




Below relates to the factual situation that this was an ARMED ROBBERY.

Photos taken and digitally dated on that day, by the BCC, show that the statements HEREIN, as to the condition of my property and yard ARE ALL FALSE, so Joanne Whiting is guilty of CRIMINAL DECEIT.

The IRREFUTABLE PROOF is the Brisbane City Councils own documents.

This letter by Joanne Whiting is completely INCONSISTENT WITH A LEGAL ENTRY BY THE BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL.  It is CONCLUSIVE.

In fact, this was ARMED ROBBERY, see
http://rateaustralianjudges.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4
http://rateaustralianjudges.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5
http://rateaustralianjudges.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6
http://rateaustralianjudges.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7
http://rateaustralianjudges.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=8 /.

At first reading by the uninitiated, that proposition by the Brisbane City Council may seem fair enough. As I shall explain, to a lawyer familiar with the HEALTH ACT 1937, to which the HEALTH REGULATION 1996 is Subsidiary Legislation or By-Law, this document shows conclusive irrefutable proof that the Brisbane City Council committed multiple crimes. The people photographed below and elsewhere at this hyperlink, THE
photographed CRIMINALS [ARMED ROBBERS], Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell and the other CRIMINALS who entered with them including Mick Maher, Monica Antony [photographed from the rear below] and corrupt cop Snr Const Henri Elias [sounds like "He lies" or " 'e lies"] Rantala, aka Henri Rentala [who has been promoted to police prosecutor because he is completely corrupt] are criminals, and can be always referred to as criminals, until the passage of time after they have been charged and convicted.  Since the corrupt Queensland Police Service have chosen to APPROVE THIS CRIMINAL CONDUCT by these Brisbane City Council Criminals, they would feel that it is likely that they will never be charged.  This is something that the Queensland Police Service, being corrupt, do regularly.   

Senior officers of the Queensland Police service  are corrupt and promote only corrupt labor cops to higher positions, to ensure the Queensland Police Service remains corrupt, to enforce the electoral fraud that keeps the present CRIMINAL labor government that committed the crimes of the destruction of the Heiner Affair Documents when they were required for a trial.  That evidence was inconvenient for the Queensland labor government, as it showed the extent of paedophilia within Queensland senior labor ranks.  This corrupt labor government, to ensure that corruption is extended in Queensland appoints criminals, and the wives of criminals to the Judiciary and to Queensland Tribunals.

This document shows conclusive irrefutable proof that the Brisbane City Council committed multiple crimes.  The did not have a Court order, which by Section 160 Ss(2) Health Act 1937 [as reproduced below and  elsewhere at this URL] was mandatory as they did not have my permission.  I was also denied the Natural Justice [aka Due Process] enshrined in Ss(2).  As they entered, they entered by "artifice".  They also entered my buildings for which I had exclusive possession. That is breaking and Entering also.  All of my property that they removed over a three day period amounted to STEALING.  This is particularly more serious as this was by a State Government Authority. 

It is necessary for the reader to understand a little relevant law. In particular, how Acts [STATUTES] and Regulations interact.  Statutes of Parliament have been debated by Parliament and passed by a majority of the ELECTED members of PARLIAMENT, usually the government. Statutes make provision for Regulations to be "gazetted" after the sections of the Regulation for that Statute, have been determined and composed by public servants.  The stated purpose for the Sections of Regulations is to foster or enable the provisions of the STATUTE to be implemented. Importantly, Regulations cannot override substantive rights in the STATUTE under which the Regulation has been composed and gazetted, or any other Statute of Parliament or of Common Law Rights, like  Natural Justice aka Due Process, which includes the Right to be Heard.   If Regulations could over-ride Statutes, then Parliament becomes an IRRELEVANCY and ELECTED PARLIAMENTARIANS and PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS, become IRRELEVANT.   This is basic law known to students in High School studying the rudiments of Law.   That the Barrister WAYNE JOHN TOLTON and Solicitor JOANNE WHITING were unaware of this is not the least bit credible.

 Health Act 1937: Section160 Entry
(1) The chief executive, the chief health officer, the local government and an officer of the department or local government may enter from time to time into and upon any house or premises for the purpose of examining as to the existence of any nuisance thereon or whether any of the provisions of this Act are being contravened, or of executing any work or making any inspection authorized to be executed or made under the provisions of this Act or any order, or local law, or making any inquiry under the provisions of this Act, or generally for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Act or any order, or local law, at any time between the hours of 9a.m. and 6p.m. of any day, or in the case of a business then at any hour when such business is in progress or is usually carried on.

(2) If such admission to any house or premises is refused, any justice, on complaint thereof by any such officer (made after reasonable notice in writing of the intention to make it has been given to the occupier), may, by order under the justice’s hand, require the occupier to admit such officer into the house or premises; and if no occupier can be found the justice may, on proof of that fact, by order under the justice’s hand authorise any such officer to enter such house or premises.

 Section 200; Health Regulation 1996
undefined
This Regulation Section 200 was current at the time of the BREAKING AND ENTERING, by Brisbane City Council, but has since been repealed and not replaced by anything.  This Section 200 basicly restates Health Act 1937, Section 160 Ss(1.)  Importantly, it did NOT give them the right to enter without a court order or my permission.  THEY HAD NEITHER.  Hence, they acted CRIMINALLY.

See: How Qld Government conceals labor CRIME.


<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<===================>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Brisbane City Council [BCC] Criminals not prosecuted.

PROSECUTE THESE CRIMINALS  



he SLOVEN SLUT CRIMINAL solicitor Joanne Whiting.

CRIMINALS [ALL guilty of ARMED ROBBERY] are Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell:
These are three of the Brisbane City Council [BCC] CriminalsFor the sake of Yahoo, Google and Google Images, LEFT to RIGHT these parasitic CRIMINALS are Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti, and Paul Maxwell:


 Menu: Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command

Menu: HaigReport's Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command:



  1. Qld police commissioner Ian Stewart is CORRUPT:

  2. Radicalised Muslim Youth Attacks Corrupt Police 1 Charles St Parramatta:

  3. Scabbard is an appropriate description for each member of the police:

  4. Taking It Up To The Corrupt Qld Police Service In 2015:

  5. Actual Email Sent To Police Commissioner and Minister: Qld Police are CORRUPT: Will they Confront us?:

  6. Overwhelming Evidence Qld Police, State of Qld & Commonwealth DPP Target Disabled Persons:

  7. Henri Rantala pathetic dumb parasite cop, devoid of integrity Statement 21st October, 2009 signed but not witnessed:

  8. Case I'm taking to the District Court: ADMISSION EVIDENCE that cops Henri Rantala, Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon and more Senior Cops are corrupt.:

  9. I Have Turned Corrupt Qld Police Attack On Me Back On Corrupt Police:

  10. OPEN EMAIL 31st October, 2012; Police Minister Dempsey Where is Ephemeral or Fictitious Arrest Warrant?:

  11. My Reply To Peter Rogers Parliamentary Crime Misconduct Committee Re Specify Complaint CMC:

  12. OPEN EMAIL Parliamentary CMC Attempted Murder, Armed Robbery Complicity of BOTH Qld police & CMC:

  13. Qld police lies to Will Cocks AHRC re police blocking My Email Stealing My Disability Aids, Computer & Camera:

  14. OPEN EMAIL Police Minister Dempsey Attempted Murder Injuries Prove Police Corruption Hospital Records DESTROYED:

  15. Proof To Police Minister Dempsey of Police Armed Robbery by Superintendent Dale Pointon, Henri Rantala, Monica Antony Three Others:

  16. More Threats Qld Police Pathetic Response Police Crimes EA MacDonald Murder Complicit Armed Robbery:

  17. OPEN LETTER 20120821 to ex-cop LNP Police Minister Jack Dempsey: Re Purported Arrest Warrant, Armed Robbery, & Attempted Murder:

  18. Attempted Murder of Russell Mathews By Qld Police on 14thJanuary,1996 At 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia Q.4065:

  19. Horrific Intended Fatal Injuries Inflicted on Russell Mathews By Qld Police on14th January, 1996 At 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia Q.4065:

  20. Index: Rantala-Gate: aka Queensland Police Corruption: Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, OsIC, Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, & State Crime Operations Command:

  21.  Rantala-Gate:  aka Queensland Police Corruption: Stat Dec: Dr Christine Eastwood; Magistrate John Costanzo; Robert Needham; Helen Couper; CMC_Peter Lindsay Hansard 25 Nov 2009:

  22. Open Letter:  Rantala-Gate:  aka Corrupt Qld Police; Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon, Security Intelligence Branch, Ethical Standards, State Crime Operations Command [does this include now retired, [since July 2008], Assistant Commissioner Peter Swindells?]:

  23. Corrupt Queensland Police;  Rantala-Gate:  Written Admission of Blocking My Email ; then Lie About Reason:

  24. Australian Government,  aka Rantala-Gate: , Tortures Political Dissident:

HaigReport Themes

Themes of  Websites
for the
HAIG   REPORT: Group of Websites:
[We expect, in time, to have all of the thousands of pages on the
HAIG   REPORT: group of websites accessible from this Menu of THEMES. Eventually, there will be 20 themes, each with an average of 15 to 20 websites/domains/directories, with each website/domain having an average of 20 pages. This would equate to 20 x (15 to 20) x 20 = 6,000 to 8,000 pages. This menu of Themes will be included near the bottom of each page, in time. With one line of code, strategically placed, this Menu of Themes is now on thousands of pages. We are continually and progressively adding pages to this Menu of Themes of website Menus.]

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

Menu: HaigReport'sThemes or Categories of the the Topics of the HaigReport Group of Websites: 
© COPYRIGHT: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews 2002 - 2018

The LATEST ADDITIONS are added to the top:


See  All 67 Domain Names in the HaigReport Group 

© COPYRIGHT: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews 2002 - 2018

Now here are the THEMES:



  1. Commonwealth of Australia Knowingly Employs LIARS, CHEATS and CRIMINALS:


  2. Government Corruption Infecting Corporates; ASX:


  3. New ADDITIONAL platform; Printed Distributed HaigReport NEWSPAPER:


  4. Self Help Law: Do your own Legals/Law:


  5. International: Corrupt Politics & Corrupt religion:


  6. About HaigReport Group of Websites including
    Vote One Russell Mathews:


  7. Russell Mathews [BCom BSc LLB & BA] Commentary additional to the rest of these Websites:


  8. Legal Rights, & BLACKLISTS of parasite residents & tenants in rental accommodation:


  9. RAMPANT POLICE CORRUPTION Exposed by HaigReport Websites; Publicize Your Complaint Here:


  10. Other public sector corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  11. RELIGION Corruption CRIME & PAEDOPHILIA Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  12. Qld Govt Translink wankers & pony spankers Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  13. Corrupt JUDGES, COURTS, & TRIBUNALS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  14. Corrupt LAWYERS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  15. Corrupt POLITICANS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  16. University of Qld Fraud & Corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  17. Corruption at other universities; Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  18. Expose' of Other CORRUPTION, including TELSTRA, under influence of public sector parasites, as exposed by the HaigReport Group of Websites:


  19. Business Promoted by HaigReport Websites:


  20. Finance by HaigReport Websites:

This page is part of the Internet presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html


SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!


Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE