The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE
 

The FUNDAMENTAL cause of
FRAUD
and CORRUPTION in Western Democracies; [such as Australia and the US]:  is:

* A GROSSLY DEFECTIVE ELECTORAL SYSTEM;

FORUM for Nambour & Sunshine_Coast, Qld Australia
but SPAMMERS BEWARE

The FIRST STEP TO ENDING THE WIDESPREAD CORRUPTION IN AUSTRALIA, IS TO END THIS MASSIVE ELECTORAL FRAUD.  
ALL VOTERS MUST BE REQUIRED TO SHOW PHOTO IDENTITY, when they VOTE and THAT PHOTO IDENTITY MUST BE RECORDED: similar to the 100 points required to open a bank acount.
That is in contrast to the EXISTING procedure FOR A VOTER TO FOLLOW AT A POLLING BOOTH. All that is required is for the 'voter' to advise of a matching pair of NAME and linked residential ADDRESS.   WHY ARE BANKS NOT RUN LIKE THAT?
 

In Australia, most corruption springs from the 'Association of Labor Lawyers' and in particular, a member, one of the greatest lowlives to ever set foot on the Australian continent; Terence Joseph Mellifont.  The corrupt labor government of Queensland, after discontinuing his prosecution for perjury, appointed the wife of this criminal to be a judge in the District Court of Queensland.  There is cogent evidence linking her to electoral fraud.

It is then a simpler, but not automatic, matter to end the fraud in the JUDICIARY, LEGAL PROFESSION, POLICE FORCES and the PUBLIC SERVICE.  Ending the ELECTORAL FRAUD is essential.  While the Electoral Fraud continues, fraud in ALL forms will prosper across the Australian society and economy.  

The fundamental cause of the extensive fraud and corruption right throughout our country, though all organs of this country, is our GROSSLY DEFECTIVE ELECTORAL SYSTEM, including our bogus, fictional electoral rolls, because they include so many "PHANTOM VOTERS".  Because the electoral procedure and rolls are so defective, they are open to widespread abuse, and are abused with the consequence that we do not have the proper government that was in fact, elected.   As we shall explain, the defective electoral system greatly favours labor, whose ideology is in reality, couturiered theft.  It is not far then to secret theft and all out labor corruption.  The sole reason that this FRAUD is possible is that there is no form of identification required by voters at ANY polling booth.  Can anyone conceive of banks operating that way: Just tell us your name and address and we will give you the money in that bank account?

* in Australia, labor ABUSES the defects
 = SYSTEMIC FRAUD;

"VOTE EARLY AND OFTEN" is the labor mantra.  It is not just a joke of the labor parasites:
The Criminal labor parasites are serious.   This electoral fraud favours labor as labor and unions find it is easier to organise numbers of labor voters.   More labor voters are more likely to be engaged in petty crime.  I am sure that many labor voters see electoral fraud [voting repeatedly in the same election], as being smart and a bit "exciting" but definitely not a serious crime. "WELL, IT IS NOT VIOLENCE", they could say. They feel that they are part of a group and so that gives them a sense of "security". They feel "entitled".

Labor gains from this major flaw in our electoral system, because labor and unions are better able to organise armies of parasites to be "bused" around multiple polling booths to repeatedly vote for the large"register" of labor inspired "phantom" voters, plus multiple voting for voters who are known to be absent or postal votes.  There are corrupt public servants in the Electoral Commissions.

This is the EVIL Robert Pugsley of the Australian Electoral Commission.  This photo was taken on Wednesday, 18 July, 2007 at about 1527aest.  He calls himself "Director of Operations" in the Brisbane office of the Australian Electoral Commission.  He is very impressed with his title.  In fact, he is just another public sector parasite, who has gained his 'promotion' for his secret corrupt dealing to increase labor's chances of "winning" elections by corrupt means.
This is the EVIL Robert Pugsley of the Australian Electoral Commission.  This photo was taken on Wednesday, 18 July, 2007 at about 1527aest.  He calls himself "Director of Operations" in the Brisbane office of the Australian Electoral Commission.  He is very impressed with his title.  In fact, he is just another public sector parasite, who has gained his 'promotion' for his secret corrupt dealing to increase labor's chances of "winning" elections by corrupt means.  He talks rubbish and jibberish.  He is clearly incompetent; just the type that labor corruption wants in the Electoral Commissions.
 
In an extreme case, this "phantom vote" could amount to as much as 10% to 15% of the enrolled vote. Theoretically, it could be far higher. In fact it does not have to be more than what is enough.  Labor does not need to win every seat nor to win any seat by more than one vote over 50%.  It is very simple arithmetic, even for the incompetent lawyers calling themselves "labor lawyers" like [the now struck off ex solicitor] Terence Joseph Mellifont aka Terry Mellifont aka TJ Mellifont.  Not all of those fraudulent votes, would be on the labor "Phantom registers".  I reiterate that the sole reason that this FRAUD is possible is that there is no form of identification required at ANY polling booth, JUST THE KNOWLEDGE OF A MATCHING PAIR OF NAME and ADDRESS, is al thatis required.

Let us now consider just how high this corrrupt vote could be, theoretically.  I reiterate that the sole reason that this FRAUD is possible is that there is no form of identification required at ANY polling booth.
To use actual figures, we can use figures from the 2004 Federal Election.   There, the Postal vote across Australia was 3.96%.  That would be the expected figure for each electorate.  Some may be higher or lower, but that is the order of postal vote, in each electorate.  It would not be expected to change radically between elections, either. 
 
There were 7729 polling booths across the country and overseas, for the 2007 Federal election for 150 seats for the House of Representatives. That is an average of over 51 booths per electorate.  It would not be p[hysically possible for an elector to travel between all boths to vote at 51 polling booths in the 10 hours of voting.  It would be pushing feasibility to do 20 booths in 10 hours.  All 51 or so booths in an electorate could be covered in  the 10 hours with a strategic plan of breaking up the booths into three groups, and then all 51 or so booths could be covered.  Were they to have all the names of all postal voters, and pre-poll voters amounting to in excess of 4%  of the electorate, that could be leveraged into 200%. Of course, that would be obvious if the poll had three time the number of votes as electors.  However, that 200% is not necessary to win any seats nor the election.  The labor union parasites need concentrate on only MARGINAL SEATS.  The average Federal Electorate has 90,000 enrolled voters.   15 carloads of each of 6 labor unionists doing 17 booths each could boost the labor vote by 1500 votes in an electorate. That is a margin or 1.67% they can beat. How many seats have a margin less than that?  Some of this 1500 would be "phantom" voters,  and some can be just multipe votes.  Do any of the Electoral Commissions collate the registers from the electoral booths [there are multiple registers at each booth] to check for repeat voting? That would be contrary to the corrupt labor "plants" in the electoral commissions. 
  I reiterate yet again, that the sole reason that this FRAUD is possible is that there is no form of identification required at ANY polling booth.  Imagine if banks operated that way: just know your name and address.

Apart from the "Registered" "phantom" voters.  There are the "unregistered" phantom voters.  These are the names of voters on electoral rolls, who are real, but have already voted by postal vote.   The carloads and busloads of labor unionists being bussed around polling booths should not find that these names are already marked as "voted".  I reiterate that the sole reason that this FRAUD is possible is that there is no form of identification required at ANY polling booth.
This means that these labor union fraudsters should have no problem perpetrating their fraud.  They are unlikely to bump into their "namesake".  It could be embarrasing if they are standing in front of their namesake in the queue and the real voter hears their own name and address when their vote is being "stolen" by the labor union fraudster.  I reiterate that the sole reason that this FRAUD is possible is that there is no form of identification required at ANY polling booth.
 

Candidates and current members standing for election have lists of the voters for whom they have obtained postal votes.  It would be risky for a labor candidate to give these names to their "voting stooges", as the pattern could point back to the labor candidate, if the fraud was ever investigated.  I ask the reader, "How often have you heard of anyone being prosecuted for this type of electoral fraud."  However, it could happen, in theory, anyway.
 
 As well, for a postal vote arranged by a labor candidate, the existing "postal" [most likely labor] vote may be uncounted as the roll shows that the voter has already voted, even once or repeatedly.   It would be far "better" to obtain the names of postal votes from the liberal candidate.  That would also tend to 'point' to it being a liberal systematic electoral fraud.

* the Australian Federal, State and Territory labor governments are thus FRAUDS;

Due to electoral fraud, all labor governments are INVALID.  ACCORDINGLY, all labor appointments to the JUDICIARY ARE INVALID, as are all other appointments of labor including of Quentin Alice Louise Bryce [Quentin Bryce] as Governor of Queensland, and then more recently, Governor-General of Australia.  All COMMISSIONERS, OMBUDSMEN and PUBLIC SERVANTS, are also invalid.   I reiterate that the sole reason that this FRAUD is possible is that there is no form of identification required at ANY polling booth.

Since labor benefits from the FRAUD in the ELECTORAL SYSTEM, all labor governments are FRAUDS, and of ZERO WORTH.   I reiterate that the sole reason that this FRAUD is possible is that there is no form of identification required at ANY polling booth.

*   THUS, all their decisions are defective/corrupt; INCLUDING all appointments to the JUDICIARY and to the offices of State Governors and Australian Governors-General.

The Judiciary can make "enforcable" decisions that are detrimental to the Executive Government, chosen from elected members, who enjoy the support of the Majority in the Lower house of an elected Parliament in the Westminster System of Government: the Ministers and Cabinet.  That Executive Government of Ministers in Cabinet, APPOINT the members of the judiciary. Self preservation is central to human nature.

The labor of Whitlam made a mistake by appointing John KERR to be Governor-General.  They did not think that he would "turn" on labor.  The labor fraudsters have vowed not to be so caught again.  They are sure that Quentin Bryce, will not turn on labor, regardless of how corrupt they become.  She is EVIL.

All appointments by the invalid ursurping labor government of Queensland to the JUDICIARY, lose their legitimacy.  The courts with those 'judges' OR 'MAGISTRATES' presiding, are nought but STAR CHAMBERS.  Those courts are a farce, masquerading as substantive tribunals, but a complete vacuum of law in reality.

Further this corruption in each election is NOT INDEPENDENT  of the labor ELECTORAL CORRUPTION in prior elections.  An incumbrant government, even if corruptly "elected", has a significant advantage over its opposition, in the subsequent election.

How often have you heard of people being prosecuted for electoral fraud, of this character? You haven't?  Of course not. These labor parasites, like Terry Mellifont [aka Terence Joseph Mellifont aka TJ Mellifont], discovered long ago that they can do it with immunity.

The forms the labor electoral fraud and abuse takes are manyfold, but rely upon TWO MAIN ASPECTS:
1.)    HAVING PHANTOM VOTERS  ENROLLED ON THE ELECTORAL ROLL;.
2.)    MULTIPLE VOTING FOR THE SAME ENROLLED 'ELECTOR'; [EITHER REAL OR PHANTOM].
A common example of the former is to have the labor parasite have their wife enrolled in an adjoining electorate in her MAIDEN NAME.  It needs to be a different state and federal electorate -  different so she does not have to line up twice in the same queue, and just to increase the degree of separation. 

I reiterate that the sole reason that this is possible is that there is not is no form of identification required at each polling booth.

It is a simple arithmetic exercise.  It is pointless doing this procedure in safe seats, except to "maintain" the phantom "register".   As we calculated above, and further here, the labor electoral fraudsters know the number of seats that have to be won or that could be in jeopardy.  We will consider average figures for Federal Seats.  The same consideration can be readily applied to state elections. There are approximately the same number of electors in each polling booth for State and Federal Elections.   There would just be more polling booths in a Federal electorate than in a State electorate.  In the 2007 Federal Election there were about 90,000 electors in each electorate for the House of Representatives.   There were about 50 polling booths in each electorate.  The labor fraudsters would probably view lining up repeatedly at the same electoral station on the same day, as tempting recognition.  Hence, many groups of labor union fraudsters are organised to be bused around in mini buses, to different polling booths, or organised into carloads to do the same and be less obvious.  They have the "name and address [and age, so as not to be ridiculous]" they will "be" at each booth pre-arranged.  They can be voting as the same person at different booths, and hope they beat the actual person to the booth they use before the real voter votes.  The names can also be "phantoms" or persons that are known to not have voted as being a postal or absentee.   If need be, they can vote as themselves repeatedly, but that is a last resort.

I reiterate that the sole reason that this is possible is that there is no form of identification required at each polling booth.

One of the major proponent of this fraud in Brisbane is this disgraced ex-solicitor and multiple perjurer, Terence Joseph Mellifont. aka Terry Mellifont aka TJ Mellifont, of 73 Hawbridge Street, CARSELDINE, BRISBANE.   Not only does he engage in it, this electoral fraud of multiple voting [voting early and often], but he also organises and encourages other labor and union parasites to do likewise.  He attends to the maintenance of the "phantom register" for his locality.  The corrupt Queensland labor government, is the beneficiary of so much of this organised electoral fraud.   That is the reason that the Goss labor Cabinet was quite hapy to shred the Heiner documents, when they were required for a CRIMINAL TRIAL.

This is the EVIL Robert Pugsley of the Australian Electoral Commission.  This photo was taken on Wednesday, 18 July, 2007 at about 1527aest.  He calls himself "Director of Operations" in the Brisbane office of the Australian Electoral Commission.  He is very impressed with his title.  In fact, he is just another public sector parasite, who has gained his 'promotion' for his secret corrupt dealing to increase labor's chances of "winning" elections by corrupt means.It "assists" these labor union fraudsters to know the identity of voters who will not be voting, and to cause fictional names to be entered on the electoral roll.  This is where corrupt labor party stooges in the electoral offices and commissions, come into their own.

If the reader does  not wish to believe that this Queensland labor government is corrupt due to the electoral fraud that elected it, consider:

*  the labor Goss cabinet would shred all the documents from the Heiner Inquiry when they knew they were required in a court case, in fact BECAUSE they were required in a court case.  It was a most deliberate criminal destruction of EVIDENCE.

That the Beattie labor government promoted the wives of CRIMINALS  to the JUDICIARY including Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick wife of the notorious criminal and multiple perjurer Terence Joseph Mellifont aka Terry Mellifont aka TJ Mellifont.

AN UNWRITTEN CODE in the electoral offices.  Any non-corruptable public servant [there must be a few, in theory at least], who stumbles into an "electoral office" or "electoral commission", is treated, like a pariah and is sent to coventry, so that the public servant applies for a transfer, in the way that only parasitic public servants can do.
 
People have been killed to protect this fraud on the country. A large proportion of the poputation, often a majority; [those who had voted against a labor candidate] are disenfranchised and defrauded, and are forced to endure an invalid "government" including a corrupt judiciary and corrupt legal profession.
This is the EVIL Robert Pugsley of the Australian Electoral Commission.  This photo was taken on Wednesday, 18 July, 2007 at about 1527aest.  He calls himself "Director of Operations" in the Brisbane office of the Australian Electoral Commission.  He is very impressed with his title.  In fact, he is just another public sector parasite, who has gained his 'promotion' for his secret corrupt dealing to increase labor's chances of "winning" elections by corrupt means.  The electoral offices can be a wonderful source of the names and addresses of voters who have obtained postal votes.

Consequent upon corrupt labor governments making judicial appointments, those judicial appointments are also CORRUPT.  A corrupt government can NEVER make VALID LEGAL appointments. 

If you personally are before a court on a trumped up charge, and you are a person of principle, you can be assured that you will not receive a fair hearing from the corrupt court, judge/magistrate.  In that situation, you are not advantaged by "going quietly".  When I have been in that situation, there is nothing to lose and everything to gain by taking on the corrupt court, and requesting the judge to disqualify himself as he has been appointed by a corrupt Executive Government.  You do not need to lead evidence on that at that time.   He has to know that to a reasonably informed bystander there is a reasonable apprehensioon of bias.

Brisbane City Council [BCC] CORRUPTION:
Breaking, Entering and Stealing.

plus ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT; CRUELTY TO ANIMALS

Brisbane City Council Corruption, breaking, entering and stealing, illegal imprisonment, CRUELTY to ANIMALS.


[go to HAIG REPORT home]  
BEWARE LABOR LAWYERS [Lavarch],
they will STEAL YOUR RIGHTS and FREEDOMS. 

This is far more serious than Beattie’s Dr DEATH, HEALTH and WATER  debacles. 

Beattie's Lavarch & coy devised the health regulation 200(1) [a regulation, so it did not have to go before parliament] to seem to give the public sector parasites the “right” to have you arrested so they can trespass in your yard AND HOME BUILDING AND STEAL YOUR PROPERTY.   WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF THAT WAS DONE TO YOU?   Imagine yourself in that situation as IT CAN HAPPEN TO YOU.

YOUR HOME IS NO LONGER YOUR CASTLE, thanks to LAVARCH and Labor.   Don’t just take my word for it.  In Queensland, labor is CORRUPT.   See the “advice” of the Labor hack commissions, at the CMC, the Legal Services Commission and the Information Commissioner [see last sentence 4.25], that the Brisbane City Council [BCC] [or any local council or other parasite] can enter your yard AND HOME BUILDING, AND STEAL YOUR PROPERTY.  THEY BROKE AND ENTERED MY HOME BUT THE POLICE COULD NOT CARE LESS; are the POLICE CORRUPT too?  Of course, that advice by the corrupt labor hacks is wrong, [people are supposed to have the protection of the courts – see below where I explain the legal position: I have been fully trained as a lawyer with an LLB]. 

Yes, without court orders the council, or any government bureaucrat who has it in for you, can come and take 30tons of topsoil from your yard and charge you for doing it. [Legally they do need court orders, but, in the corrupt labor state, the Courts and police do not care.]  The Police will support them with false arrest and false imprisonment. All that is needed is a good story.  Forget about the truth.  It is irrelevant that it was breaking the law; both administrative Law and CRIMINAL LAW. That it is against the law is no problem.  That is what happened to me.   I had been working at improving the top soil in my yard for four years.  It was of the quality of high grade potting mix, being mainly organic compost.   I had been mulching my yard diligently for four years. The Brisbane City Council [BCC] decided that they would pick on me [check the webpage about why I am picked on, especially by gutless parasitic lowlife scum like public servants, when I have the time to publish it].  It was illegal discrimination.  Excavator and heap of soilThey even had a bob-cat in to scoop the top 100mm of my soil, plus an excavator, no less, to steal the tons of valuable bobcat and soilcompost, behind a retaining wall [which they found they had to destroy - Hughie's desire??].  I had that compost to improve my yard and to save water. The BCC also stole all my water saving material I had to INSTALL WATER SAVING PROCEDURES.  [THIS IS THE BCC's PERVERSE REASON THAT THEY STOLE MY MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND POSSESSIONS; TO PREVENT ME FROM DOING GOOD THINGS, in the then looming, now present, wateer crisis.] I had all that in my landscaping as I was preparing to make my yard a very productive, and EXTREMELY WATER EFFICIENT vegetable and fruit garden to grow my own food as I am disabled and so very poor.   They had a variety of trucks come to load up different lots of my property I had in my yard. They neatly stacked it in the tray of the small trucks. They had stolen and then sold or gave my property to their mates.  I did not have my property just lying on the ground but rather stacked up on blocks at least 30 cm above the ground as required.

When the home owner fights back through the courts the Supreme Court will dismiss the application and declare that home owner a vexatious litigant.  On both occasions I produced BCC documents by way of affidavit showing conclusively that BCC and their parasites trespassed, stole my property AND HAD THE QUEENSLAND POLICE ASSIST THEM.  [I’ll tell you about the parasite of a cop below. He perjured himself in his affidavit. Other police have since denigrated him to me. Rantala is his name and here’s his photo.]purjuring police Rantala

They are not all corrupt, but enough are and those who are not are merely complicit.  Magistrates refused to allow the Police to convict the home owner after five separate charges were laid. Five false charges - yet the Minister for Police says the Police did nothing wrong, This is because he is working for the bureaucracy and not the voters.

I am FULLY TRAINED as a LAWYER so I will explain the law briefly.   See the Section 160 of the Health Act 1937 attached.  See Sub-Section 2 of Section 160.  It clearly states that I must be given a right to be heard, before they gain the necessary court order.  I was not given a hearing nor did they have a court order. Sub section (2) ensures Natural Justice [aka Due Process and aka Procedural Fairness] to me in that I should have been given notice of a hearing where it was proposed to cause detriment to me.   The Right to be heard is a Common Law right, and does not need to be legislated, but it has been.

What Lavarch and her corrupt cohorts did to try to allow her public sector parasitic labor mates invade peoples homes without court orders [the BCC knew that they needed a court order – see their letter to me and told me in that letter they would apply to the Magistrates Court, THEY KNEW THEY WERE CRIMINAL],  THEY ARE  CERTAIN TO CONTINUE.

,   SO    VOTE THEM OUT.    Anyone  will be better than a corrupt  government  that  has  corrupted our whole legal system.

[go to HAIG REPORT home]