HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.

The EVIDENCE that the Queensland Information Commissions states that the SOLICITOR for the Brisbane City Council [BCC] is a LIAR.

The EVIDENCE that the Queensland Information Commissioner states that the SOLICITOR  for the Brisbane City Council [BCC] is a LIAR.

The parasitic employees of the BCC had decided that they would gut my yard.  We need look no further than Garth Donnelly and Gaylene Vivian to find a motive. They knew they needed a court order, but did not want to have to argue against me as they did not have a case.  They instead decided on a process whereby they would enter my yard and steal all of my property, break and enter my home/house and steal more of my property, and then if really put to the test, they could just claim, "oh sorr-rry, we must have mad a mistake because we thought the legal opinion we gained meant that we did not have to obtain a court order."

They knew they needed  court order:
I have concealed the identity of the BCC solicitor, [and the barrister who was clearly prepared to do anything to get a quid], because although a real dumb lowlife parasite, I do not wish to detract from the real culprits, the BCC and ALL BCC STAFF, as that is the culture at BCC: they think by cheating others through dishonesty and clandestine action is "being smart", because really they are too dumb to be "smart" in any real way..  The plan of these lowlifes, all along was to say that they had legal opinion that said that a court order was unnecessary.   It appears this solicitor had discussions, nothing in writing, with a barrister to do as required.   Both the BCC and the barrister believed that the legal opinion would attract Legal Profession Privilege [lpp].  In fact, the BCC claimed lpp when I attempted to gain access to it under Freedom of Information [FOI].   

The important words to note here is the last sentenance in the second paragraph which reads, "Council has obtained legal advice  that confirms that your consent to that entry is not required and Council is authorised to do all acts necessary to obtain entry and perform the work."

The Queensland Information Commissioner wrote me a ten page letter dated 23 May. 2006 regarding this matter of the gravamen of  the release to me of the legal opinion.  The BCC had in fact waived privilege [lpp] albeit it unintentionally.  Even BCC "lawyers" are so dumb that they waive the "protection" they already had by lpp without even realising they had.  They were just too cocky about how "smart" they were.

So, as an independant third party, the Queensland Information Commissioner has stated: "The legal advice does not state that the applicant's consent to entry was not required."